The ProblemPlatformHow It Works90-Day Audit
AI Governance Infrastructure · Fintech Edition

From AI chaos
to executive clarity.

AI governance without illusion.

Most fintechs are deploying AI with no formal governance — no inventory, no named ownership, no evidence trail. ControlGrid is the control system that changes that, before the examiner asks.

Built by Timothy L. Harper Sr.— Senior Technical Program Manager with 15+ years delivering privacy, safety, security, and regulated-cloud programs at Google, Hulu, and leading institutions. MS, Computer & Network Security.

5frameworksSR 11-7 · CFPB · NIST AI RMF
EU AI Act · FCRA
3ownersBusiness · Technical · Risk
Required per AI system
90daysZero governance
to audit-ready evidence
50+ controlsNIST AI RMF-aligned
controls library

The Risk Is Real

Your AI is live.
Your governance is not.

Mid-market fintechs are deploying AI across credit decisioning, fraud detection, and underwriting — with no formal inventory, no named accountability, and no evidence trail for regulators.

Examiner Scenario

CFPB Inquiry — Credit Scoring Model

Examiner requests documentation for your AI-assisted credit decisioning system. Who owns the risk? What controls are in place? When was it last reviewed? Without ControlGrid, the answer is a spreadsheet, three Slack threads, and a two-week scramble.

Board Scenario

Audit Committee — AI Risk Briefing

Board asks for an AI risk summary ahead of the audit committee. No maturity score. No governance trail. No named accountability chain.That's not a governance gap — that's a liability.

What's typically missing

  • 01No formal AI system inventory — systems exist in Slack, not a register
  • 02Ownership implied, never formally assigned — three people think someone else owns the risk
  • 03Risk assessments are informal or nonexistent — gut feel, not scored evidence
  • 04No approval trail — nothing to show an examiner when they ask "who signed off?"
  • 05Shadow AI is invisible — models deployed without compliance review
  • 06Regulatory mappings are manual — SR 11-7 and CFPB applicability guessed per audit

“AI governance is not a policy.
It is a control system for decision-making at scale.”

ControlGrid · Core Principle

Five Core Questions

ControlGrid answers all five.

Every AI governance failure traces back to one unanswered question. ControlGrid operationalizes the complete answer to all five — structured, enforced, and audit-ready.

01 ·

What AI systems exist?

Complete org-wide inventory with shadow AI detection — every system registered, classified, and visible to the CISO.

AI Inventory
02 ·

What risks do they create?

Structured risk register with severity × likelihood scoring across technical, regulatory, ethical, operational, and data dimensions.

Risk Register
03 ·

Who owns those risks?

Named Business Owner, Technical Owner, and Risk Owner required per system — enforced at intake as a blocking gate.

Ownership Engine
04 ·

What controls mitigate them?

50+ NIST AI RMF-aligned controls with named owners and due dates. Evidence thresholds enforced by risk tier before acceptance.

Controls Library
05 ·

How is governance proven?

Append-only audit trail, regulatory evidence package export, and board-ready executive brief — generated in one click.

Evidence Engine

How It Works

From intake to board brief
in 90 days.

The same structured governance workflow applies to every AI system — whether evaluated before deployment or already running in production without governance.

STEP 01

System Intake & Registration

Every AI system formally registered — use case, data types, model source, autonomy level, and regulatory exposure captured at intake. Three named owners required before any system proceeds. Missing ownership is a UI and API-enforced blocking gate.

Intake
STEP 02

Org-Wide AI Inventory

Registered systems appear in the org-wide inventory — filterable by risk level, owner, status, and regulatory framework. Shadow AI flagged as unregistered and surfaced to the CISO immediately.

Inventory
STEP 03

Risk Assessment & Scoring

Structured risk entry with 5-dimension scoring. AI-generated risk narratives in plain English with concrete failure scenarios. Regulatory frameworks auto-mapped — CFPB, SR 11-7, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, FCRA.

Risk
STEP 04

Controls Assignment & Evidence

Controls from the NIST-aligned library assigned per risk with named owners and due dates. Evidence thresholds enforced by tier — CRITICAL requires 3 documents. Acceptance blocked until thresholds are met.

Controls
STEP 05

Multi-Stakeholder Approval

HIGH risks trigger 3 parallel approval workflows — Risk Owner, Legal, Security — all must approve. Formal declaration with named accountability, acceptance basis, and next review date. A digital governance certificate, not a checkbox.

Approval
STEP 06

Executive Brief & Audit Evidence

Board-ready PDF from live platform data — Governance Maturity Score, risk heatmap, control completion rate, 30/60/90-day trend lines. Regulatory evidence package downloadable in under 60 seconds for examiner delivery.

Reporting

Ready to govern your AI systems?

The 90-Day Audit takes you from zero to audit-ready — led by the founder, not a junior consultant.

Request the Audit →

Why ControlGrid

Built for fintech.
Built upstream.

Vertical Depth

Fintech-native regulatory precision

SR 11-7, CFPB, FCRA, and OCC guidance mapped into every workflow — not bolted on as labels. Horizontal platforms cannot replicate this without a complete rebuild.

Market Position

Upstream of every tool you already use

ControlGrid operates before Vanta, before ServiceNow, before Credo AI. It's the governance foundation those tools assume already exists — and usually doesn't.

Immutability

Append-only audit trail by design

Every governance action — intake, risk, approval, rejection — is timestamped, attributed, and immutable at the ORM layer. Not a log. A legal record.

Scoring Engine

Governance Maturity Score

Five-level weakest-link model. One unaddressed system holds back your entire org's maturity. Boards see a letter grade and a trend — not a status report.

Delivery Model

Consulting-led, not self-serve

Every engagement starts with the 90-Day AI Governance Readiness Audit. Governance infrastructure requires expert activation — not a setup wizard and a free trial.

Examiner Ready

Evidence packages, one click

What previously took 2–3 weeks of manual assembly is a downloadable ZIP, current as of this morning. Controls, approvals, evidence, regulatory mapping — always ready.

Regulatory Coverage

Mapped to the frameworks
regulators actually use.

Risk categories automatically map to applicable frameworks at intake. No manual cross-referencing. No consultants needed to translate.

SR 11-7CFPB AI GuidanceNIST AI RMFEU AI ActFCRAISO 42001SOC 2OCC Model Risk GuidanceFDIC AI GuidanceSEC AI Disclosures

Common Questions

Questions CISOs ask first.

No. ControlGrid is a governance layer, not infrastructure. It does not connect to your models, access your training data, or require changes to your ML pipeline. Your credit scoring model, fraud system, and underwriting engine continue to operate exactly as they do today. ControlGrid is where you record, review, approve, and track the governance around those systems.

ControlGrid uses multi-tenant architecture with org-level data isolation enforced on every database query, an append-only audit trail that is immutable at the ORM layer, and encryption in transit and at rest. Enterprise SSO via SAML is on the roadmap. We're glad to walk through our current security architecture in detail during an initial conversation.

Vanta and similar tools assume your AI governance already exists — they certify and audit against controls you've defined. ControlGrid is the layer that creates those controls in the first place: the inventory, risk register, ownership, and approval trail. It operates upstream of Vanta, ServiceNow, and Credo AI, producing the governed foundation those tools depend on.

A fully configured ControlGrid instance, a complete AI system inventory with three named owners per system, a scored risk register mapped to applicable regulatory frameworks, assigned controls with evidence, a Governance Maturity Score, and a regulatory evidence package you can hand to an examiner on Day 90. The engagement converts to an ongoing SaaS subscription.

ControlGrid is built fintech-first — the regulatory depth (SR 11-7, CFPB, FCRA, OCC) is native, not generic. That said, the same governance engine serves any regulated organization deploying AI: regional banks, InsurTech, and compliance consultancies delivering AI audit services at scale. If you're regulated and deploying AI, it applies.

Entry Point

Start with the
90-Day Readiness Audit.

Every ControlGrid engagement begins here. A structured, consulting-led audit that inventories your AI systems, assesses governance maturity, maps regulatory exposure, and delivers a fully configured platform — in 90 days.

At Day 90, you have a live ControlGrid instance, a Governance Maturity Score, a complete risk register with named accountability, and an evidence package ready for an examiner today. The audit converts to a SaaS subscription.

Email Us to Get Started

Opens your email client. No forms, no sales queue — direct to the founder.

or reach us directly

tlharper@gmail.com

We respond within one business day.

Not ready to talk?

AI Governance Maturity Scorecard

A printable self-assessment worksheet that benchmarks your organization against the five-level governance maturity model — in about 10 minutes. See exactly where your gaps are before you commit to anything.

Download the Scorecard (PDF)